![](https://sbx-attachments-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/nvz6edxe33wxnbdpj85t7ictnpu2?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3D%221-niaid.jpg%22%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%271-niaid.jpg&response-content-type=image%2Fjpeg&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6MHW4YOXXGMMU2FH%2F20240908%2Fus-east-2%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240908T000437Z&X-Amz-Expires=172800&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=0914e6c3e4c22e9c979548034b96c54f1f5bf3fd9bd4b2cb95dcad2408ca3e1f)
To those who've never thought about volunteering to be intentionally infected to test a vaccine, the idea may at first seem a bit bonkers. But such "challenge" studies not only have a rich history, but nearly 40,000 people have already checked the box "I am interested in being exposed to the coronavirus to speed up vaccine development" at 1daysooner, a website and non-profit organization that launched in April.
Challenge studies go by other names: "controlled human infection models," "human viral challenge," and "purposeful infection." Dripping virus-tainted saltwater into a volunteer's nostrils enables researchers to track infection, and the immune system's response to it, right from the start. The approach complements phase 3 clinical "field" trials of efficacy that await natural infection in the community.
To continue reading, go to Genetic Literacy Project, where this post first appeared.